The parallel passages between Matthew and Luke that are thought to represent Q are presented.

Paper arguing that Q is a late (80 C.E.) document.

Paper arguing that Q is a late ,80 C.E., document.

The parallel passages of Matthew, Mark, and Luke in the original Greek with color coding. Useful for identifying the double tradition material that makes up Q.

Mark Goodacre argues against the Two Source Hypothesis in favor the Farrer hypothesis, according to which Luke obtained the "Q" material from the Gospel of Matthew.

Links to articles and essays addressing the subject of Q.

The parallel passages between Q and Thomas as presented by Stevan Davies.

The Q material as found in Luke and presented by Stevan Davies.

Mahlon Smith argues that Q belongs in the scholar's canon.

The verses in Q in several lists provided by modern commentators.

A scholarly defense of the Two Source Hypothesis according to which Matthew and Luke used Mark as well as a second non-extant source termed Q.

A summary of opinions on the Q Gospel.

Includes the contents of Q by verse, a synopsis for Q, links to translations of Q, links to resources on Q, an essay in defense of the existence of Q, and introductory information with scholarly quotes.

The text of Q as preserved in the verses of Luke and presented by J.B. Tabor.

James M. Robinson maintains that the historical Jesus is best revealed in Q.

A defense of the Two Source Hypothesis, according to which Matthew and Luke based their gospels on Mark and Q.

Summary of the dominant synoptic theory by Stephen Carlson.

An abstract of Kloppenborg's thesis of the formation of Q in successive stages.