Asserts that excluding private US citizens residing abroad results in a distortion of the congressional apportionment process.

This paper was filed to defend the effort by the Clinton administration to alter the Census results with statistical guesses at what the population count should have been.

Editorial comment on the premise that the US census is unconstitutional and designed to assist in expanding a socialist state.

Argues that census race data is used to allocate tax dollars for racial quota programs, which discriminates unfairly against anyone not in a politically correct group.

Argues that the US census focuses too much attention on "race", essentially pitting each race against another for special government favors.

The author argues that a citizen should answer only the "how many residents at this address" section of the census form, including why it is a Constitutional right to do so.

Defends the census, explaining some of how it works from a Census office kind of perspective.

Criticizes how the U.S. census counts prisoners and includes factsheets, testimony, and research on how economic and political resources are allocated based on population.

States that diversity (continental origin, national origins, and ethnicities) is literally smothered by insensitive bureaucrats who developed the labels that are used in the USA 2000 Census forms.

Editorial arguing that the question of race on the U.S. Census is racist.