An article by James Fitzgerald.

A review of the Joseph Sobran book.

Various quotations from famous people on the authorship debate.

Professor Alan Nelson's site includes all 76 of Oxford's letters and a great deal of other information, together with his ideas on why Oxford could not have been Shakespeare.

Mark K. Anderson invokes Kuhn and Heisenberg, backed up by Ovid, Bottom, Pyramus and Thisbe in support of the thesis.

Short article about using linguistics to argue for de Vere's authorship.

Edward De Vere, Earl of Oxford, Renaissance English poet and courtier. Life, works, resources. At Luminarium.

A poem on the authorship debate, by Michael J. Farrand.

33 Reasons to Doubt that Mr. Shaksper wrote Shakespeare, by Robert Brazil.

Examines the possible misinformation about Shakespearean authorship presented as fact by the National Endowment for the Arts.

Peter Morton analyzes Andrew Field's The Lost Chronicle of Edward de Vere (1990), and Absent Thee from Felicity (1975), by Rhoda Henry Messner.

The distinctive orthography of Edward de Vere 17th earl of Oxford.

Background on the theory.

Includes known portraits and portrayals of Oxford, his friends, family and surroundings.

An analysis of Roger Stritmatter's dissertation.

Further analysis of the dissertation.

The Encyclopedia Britannica synopsis of the Shakespeare-Oxford debate.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens elaborates on his conclusion that the Earl of Oxford was the true Shakespeare, in this (abridged) version of a 1992 article.

J. Thomas Looney argues in favor of Oxford.

Extensive site with many articles, history, bibliography, conference news and records.

Mark Alexander looks at the history and scholarship on the issue of Shakespeare's knowledge of the law.

Parallels in de Vere's life and Shakespeare's works.

de Vere's copy of the Geneva Bible and Shakespeare's Plays.

From U.S. News Online.

Paul Franssen's review of the Richard F. Whalen book.

A comprehensive guide to British literature of the Renaissance with over 100 original pages, biographies, and works never before published on the web. Also includes several hundred links to additional resources.

Brief article claiming de Vere's authorship.

Tom Bethel's article from Atlantic Monthly, October, 1991.

Oxfordian author Tom Bethell replies to article by Irvin Matus in October, 1991 issue of Atlantic Magazine.

Authorship of Shakespeare's works, including information on the 17th Earl of Oxford's travels, spying, and epic heraldry adventures.

Promoting the view that Oxford was the true author of Shakespeare's works.

Annual conference that usually addresses the authorship debate.

Joseph Sobran responds to Prof. Alan Nelson's Fall 1999 Shakespeare Quarterly review of Alias Shakepseare.

Dissects the errors in an analysis of the authorship debate by the New York Times.

News, resources and discussion boards on the Shakespeare Authorship question with special emphasis on Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford.

An auditor/accountant experienced in investigations argues that Edward de Vere is the true author of Shakespeare's works.

WGBH's TV program exploring the Shakespeare authorship question. Tapes and transcripts available.

Oxfordian, with many essays; reproductions of William Shakespeare's six possible signatures; a discussion of various Shakespeare forgeries and forgers.

A computer-aided analysis of the commonalities of style in de Vere and Shakespeare.

James Hammond's argues in favor of Oxford as the author of Shakespeare's works.